Access by role
Each person sees only what their role needs. A coordinator, an investigator and an administrator do not get the same view, and access is set up with you before launch.
Research software holds personal, and often health, information. This page sets out what we build in, where the data can live, and what we do not claim, in the terms a compliance officer needs.
Controls we design in. The exact set is agreed for each study.
Andolasoft designs research study software with access by role, a log of changes to participant records, and encryption between the apps, the portal and the server. The data can live on cloud infrastructure built for protected health information or on servers the institution controls, and AI features can be kept away from row-level data. We do not claim HIPAA certification, SOC 2 certification or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance for any system.
These are agreed with you for each study, not bolted on at the end.
Each person sees only what their role needs. A coordinator, an investigator and an administrator do not get the same view, and access is set up with you before launch.
Changes to participant records are logged, so you can answer who changed a record and when.
Data is encrypted between the participant apps, the coordinator portal and the server. We did this on our research institute project.
See that projectThe system can run on cloud infrastructure built for protected health information, or on servers your institution controls. We agree this before anything is built.
Photos and other participant files go to secure cloud storage rather than being kept on a shared drive or in email.
If a system includes AI features, we design it so row-level participant data is not sent to a language model where you require that, and we can use models that run locally.
Short answers, in plain terms.
| Question your compliance team asks | Where we stand today |
|---|---|
| Who can see participant records? | Only the roles you set up. Access is agreed with you before launch and can be changed later. |
| Can we see who changed a record? | Yes. Changes to participant records are logged. |
| Is data protected when it moves? | Yes. Data is encrypted between the apps, the portal and the server. |
| Where is the data stored? | On cloud infrastructure built for protected health information, or on your institution’s servers. You decide. |
| Does participant data go to an AI model? | Only if you want that. We can keep row-level data away from language models. |
| Is the software HIPAA certified? | No. HHS does not certify software for HIPAA. Compliance depends on how the system is built, hosted and run, and on the agreements in place. See below. |
| Can we sign an NDA first? | Yes. We can sign one before the first technical conversation. |
We design systems for HIPAA requirements. We do not describe software as “HIPAA certified”, and we do not claim SOC 2 certification or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance for any system. If your study needs one of these, we say what the system would need to meet it, and whether that is in scope.
Your IRB, your privacy officer and your agreements with participants set the rules for the study. We build to those rules. We do not replace them.

A ten-point checklist for a research lab to check who can see participant data, whether changes are logged, and what to ask before you trust a study tool.
Read article
A practical checklist for keeping consent and enrolment records that are easy to find and explain. Your IRB still sets the rules for your study.
Read article
A seven-step guide for research labs with no software team: map your spreadsheets, fix the rules, pick a route, migrate safely and hand the system an owner.
Read articleTell us what your IRB, privacy officer and data agreements require, and we will say what a system for your study would need. You will hear back from a solutions architect within one business day.
We can sign an NDA before the first technical conversation.